Tilda Publishing

MATERIAL PROPERTIES AND PERFORMANCE CHARACTERISTICS OF MODERN SYNTHETIC FIBER ROPES

PART I: ABRASION RESISTANCE, CUT RESISTANCE, AND COEFFICIENT OF FRICTION

Properties & Characteristics of Ropes
Last Update: 02.2026
Keep in mind that the relevance of information might change over time.
In Part I of this series, we reviewed the primary polymers used today in the manufacture of synthetic ropes. We also outlined their internal structure and discussed key material properties such as density, strength, and elasticity.

In Part II, we continue our examination of polyamide, polyester, aramid, ultra-high-molecular-weight polyethylene, and other notable textile materials, applying this knowledge to the performance characteristics, constructions, and real-world applications of modern fiber ropes.

Abrasion Resistance

Abrasion resistance refers to a material’s ability to withstand mechanical wear caused by friction against external surfaces or against elements of the material itself.

For textiles in general — and ropes in particular — abrasion can be categorized as either external or internal.

External Abrasion

External abrasion, also referred to as surface abrasion, describes the wear that occurs on the outer surface of a textile material when it comes into contact with rough terrain, sharp edges, or abrasive* particles.

External abrasion results in the gradual degradation of the rope’s outer layers: the sheath becomes fuzzy, mass and diameter decrease, individual fibers are damaged or severed, and, consequently, the rope’s overall strength and service life are reduced.
Contact with rough rock surfaces is one of the primary causes of wear and reduced service life of climbing ropes.
Contact with rough surfaces is one of the primary causes of wear and reduced service life of climbing ropes.
Source: edelrid.com

*Abrasives are exceptionally hard particles or surfaces with high roughness (i.e., pronounced surface irregularities) that significantly accelerate the mechanical wear of textile materials.

At present, there is no single, universally accepted standard for assessing the external abrasion resistance of ropes and the textile fibers used in their construction.

As a result, durability data may vary significantly between sources depending on:
  • the testing methodology employed (e.g., Martindale abrasion tests — ISO 12947, ASTM D4966; Taber abrasion — ASTM D3884; flex abrasion — ASTM D3885);
  • test conditions, including load magnitude, loading frequency, and the characteristics of the abrasive surface;
  • the intrinsic properties of the material and the textile characteristics of the specific fiber.

Nevertheless, the general trend is as follows:

PA > HMPE > PES > LCP > Aramid > PBO > PE ≥ PP

(External abrasion resistance of materials in dry conditions, from highest to lowest)

Abrasion resistance of materials used in rope manufacturing
*Polypropylene and polyethylene have relatively low melting points. As a result, under intense friction, ropes made from these materials tend to fail due to thermal melting rather than abrasive wear.
Number of abrasion cycles sustained by various synthetic fibers during metal-on-fiber abrasion testing according to the Japanese standard JIS L 1095:1999
The number of abrasion cycles sustained by various synthetic fibers during metal-on-fiber abrasion testing at a relative load of 0.9 gf/dtex, according to the Japanese standard JIS L 1095:1999.
Source: «High-Performance and Specialty Fibers», 2016.
As can be seen, aramid fibers do not exhibit particularly high abrasion resistance — especially when compared with the widely used and inexpensive nylon. Nevertheless, aramids are often marketed as high-performance materials for abrasion protection in products ranging from gloves to ropes.

This apparent contradiction has a straightforward explanation. Aramid fibers combine high tensile strength with excellent thermal resistance, outstanding cut resistance, and — in the case of some para-aramid grades — even good resistance to moisture. These are precisely the areas where nylon performs relatively poorly. When elevated temperatures develop in the abrasion zone (as inevitably happens during intense friction) or moisture levels increase, nylon rapidly loses both strength and wear resistance. Aramid, by contrast, largely retains its mechanical properties. As a result, aramid’s seemingly “moderate” abrasion resistance often proves more reliable in real-world conditions than another material’s “excellent” laboratory rating.

*The influence of temperature and moisture on polymer materials will be discussed in more detail in Part III of this series.

Internal Abrasion

Internal abrasion, also known as inter-strand abrasion or yarn-on-yarn abrasion, refers to wear that develops inside a textile material as a result of repeated cyclic loading.
Mechanism of Internal Abrasion in Ropes
When a rope is subjected to tension or bending, its fibers, yarns, and strands repeatedly elongate and shift relative to one another. At the same time, the rope’s helical structure undergoes radial compression, generating normal forces that resist relative sliding between adjacent elements. Together, these compressive and shear interactions produce friction, which in turn leads to mechanical wear manifested as abrasion, damage, and the gradual degradation of the rope’s internal structure.

Friction inevitably generates heat, causing localized temperature rises within abrasion zones. Elevated temperatures soften fiber surfaces, reduce their mechanical properties, and accelerate material degradation. As damage accumulates, fibers become increasingly fuzzy, while fractured fragments collect along abrasion boundaries, further increasing friction.

With continued exposure to cyclic loading, friction, and heat, microcracks begin to form or propagate on fiber surfaces. These cracks often originate from manufacturing defects and typically grow perpendicular to the direction of friction. Their propagation results in fiber fibrillation and further deterioration of the material structure.

Over time, repeated loading and unloading cycles lead to progressive strength loss, ultimately resulting in fatigue failure of the rope.
Propagation of transverse microcracks and longitudinal fibrillation in Spectra®-1000 HMPE yarn with increasing numbers of abrasion cycles.
Propagation of transverse microcracks and longitudinal fibrillation in Spectra®-1000 HMPE yarn with increasing numbers of abrasion cycles from 0 (a) to 2000 (e) during ASTM D6611 yarn-on-yarn testing.
Source: «Yarn on yarn abrasion failure mechanism of ultrahigh molecular weight polyethylene fiber», 2021
To evaluate internal abrasion resistance in textile materials used for rope production, the following standards are commonly applied:

  • ASTM D6611 "Standard Test Method for Wet and Dry Yarn-on-Yarn Abrasion Resistance".
  • Cordage Institute CI-1503 "Test Method for Yarn-on-Yarn Abrasion, Wet and Dry".

Factors Affecting Abrasion Resistance of Ropes

1) Molecular Structure of the Rope Material
Materials with flexible molecular chains — such as polyamide (PA), polyester (PES), and high-modulus polyethylene (HMPE) — generally offer superior abrasion resistance compared to rigid-chain polymers like aramids (PPTA) and polyarylates (PAR / LCP).

However, flexible-chain polymers have significantly lower thermal resistance, as they lack aromatic (benzene) rings in their molecular structure. Under conditions of high-frequency abrasion, where heat cannot dissipate effectively from the friction zone, flexible-chain fibers degrade much faster.

Rigid-chain polymers, by contrast, maintain their properties better at elevated temperatures. Yet their relatively low elasticity and toughness** promote fiber fibrillation during abrasion, leading to fuzz formation and, in practice, lower abrasion resistance than might be expected.
Climbing rope abrasion resistance test.
Nylon’s flexible polymer chain structure provides a high degree of elongation, elastic recovery*, and toughness**, which gives nylon ropes exceptional resistance to cyclic deformation and abrasion. However, nylon’s abrasion resistance decreases significantly in wet environments and at elevated temperatures (e.g., under high-frequency abrasion), which is why polyester ropes are often preferred in such conditions.
Source: youtube.com/@RopeLab

*Elastic recovery describes a material’s ability to return to its original length after unloading. It is defined as the ratio of elastic elongation to total elongation, expressed as a percentage.


**In solid mechanics, toughness refers to a material’s capacity to absorb mechanical energy before fracturing. It depends on both strength (resistance to failure under applied load) and plasticity (the ability to undergo permanent deformation prior to fracture).

In textile engineering, fiber toughness is commonly characterized by the work of rupture, defined as the total energy absorbed before tensile failure. This value corresponds to the area under the stress–strain curve and is measured in units of energy (e.g., joules or N·cm). When normalized by linear density, it is referred to as the specific work of rupture and expressed in N/tex.

2) Textile Characteristics of the Rope Material
Including,

  • Fineness, expressed either as the fiber cross-sectional diameter or its linear density. As a rule, larger-diameter fibers exhibit higher resistance to yarn-on-yarn abrasion. This is explained by the fact that under high cyclic loading, thicker fibers provide a smaller effective contact area between adjacent elements, thereby lowering frictional forces and heat buildup.
Correlation between LCP fiber diameter and the number of cycles sustained during yarn-on-yarn abrasion testing
Increasing LCP fiber diameter results in a higher number of cycles sustained during yarn-on-yarn abrasion testing.
Source: «Structure and Properties of High-Performance Fibers» by Gajanan Bhat, 2016
  • Density. Increasing the number of fibers per unit length enhances cohesion*, distributes load and wear across a greater number of contact points, and reduces material porosity (free space between yarns), surface roughness, and the coefficient of friction (see below). Taken together, these effects improve the material’s resistance to external abrasion.

*Cohesion (from Latin cohaesus, meaning “bound” or “connected”) describes the intermolecular forces binding a homogeneous material together. It reflects the intrinsic strength of the material and its ability to resist external mechanical influences.

Comparison of ropes with different sheath strand counts
Kernmantle ropes with 8/16/24/32/48-strand sheaths.
For a given rope diameter, higher sheath strand counts lead to finer, more densely packed yarns and fibers, significantly improving resistance to external abrasion.
Source: marlowropes.com
  • Twist, expressed as the number of turns per unit length, strongly influences abrasion behavior. Higher twist levels increase fiber packing density, restrict relative fiber movement, and reduce the risk of fiber pull-out and damage. Increased stiffness also limits excessive deformation under pressure, reducing the effective contact area with abrasive surfaces.

  • Hairiness refers to the presence of protruding fibers on the material surface. High hairiness increases friction and accelerates mass loss, thereby reducing abrasion resistance. Materials with rigid polymer chains — such as aramids and polyarylates — tend to fibrillate more intensely during abrasion. In contrast, flexible-chain polymers like high-modulus polyethylene and polyester generate fewer and shorter surface fibrils.
3) Rope Coating
To enhance abrasion resistance, specialized treatments (coatings) may be applied either during fiber and yarn production or to finished ropes.

The choice of coating depends on the rope’s intended application and operating environment. Some treatments form a surface film that increases friction and grip, reduces slippage, and limits friction-induced heating. Others function as lubricants and heat conductors, reducing internal abrasion under cyclic loading, lowering external friction, and facilitating heat dissipation, ultimately improving rope durability.

Another critical function of coatings is moisture protection. Some materials are particularly sensitive to water; for example, in polyamide, water acts as a plasticizer, weakening hydrogen bonds at the molecular level. This leads to increased elongation under load, reduced tensile strength and energy absorption capacity, as well as diminished resistance to abrasion.

A more detailed discussion of moisture's influence on polyamide ropes can be found in the article The Effect of Water on the Properties of Dynamic Ropes”.
A "dry treatment" compound applied to a climbing rope to enhance water repellency and abrasion resistance.
Sources: Tendon, WeighMyRack
Abrasion test videos by Mammut clearly illustrate the performance differences between treated and untreated synthetic climbing ropes.
4) Rope Condition
Ropes that are wet, worn, or contaminated — especially with abrasive particles like sand or dust — are significantly less resistant to abrasion than their clean, dry, and unused counterparts.
Wear cycle in dirty ropes
The dirtier the rope, the faster its sheath wears out and gets fuzzy.
The fuzzier the sheath gets, the easier it traps even more dirt.
The dirtier and fuzzier the rope becomes, the more it starts to feel like sandpaper.
The more it feels like sandpaper, the faster it wears down gear and surfaces it comes into contact with.
Source: youtube.com/@HardIsEasy
5) External Factors
Including,

  • The characteristics of the contact surface: the size and geometry of contact points, their sharpness, hardness, roughness, thermal conductivity, and etc.

  • Loading conditions, such as load magnitude, loading frequency, and contact pressure between the rope and the abrasive surface.
  • Sliding speed of the rope over the abrasive surface. At low sliding speeds, fibers can deform, recover, redistribute stresses, and reduce local stress concentrations. As speed increases, contact time shortens and fibers are unable to adapt to the rising mechanical demands, resulting in more brittle failure. Increased frictional intensity also raises the risk of localized heating, which can soften or melt materials with limited thermal stability (e.g., PE, HMPE, PP, PA), thereby degrading their mechanical properties, including abrasion resistance.
Rope friction on a rock surface.
Increasing sliding speed reduces fiber adaptation time and increases local heating, thereby accelerating rope abrasion.
Source: youtube.com/@mammutvideo
  • Environmental conditions, such as humidity, temperature, and exposure to chemicals.

While the influence of temperature is relatively straightforward and has already been mentioned, the effect of moisture on the abrasion resistance of synthetic ropes depends strongly on both the material type and the loading regime.

In certain situations, water may be beneficial. It can reduce internal and external abrasion by lowering friction between fibers and strands, as well as between the rope’s sheath and contacting surfaces. Water also provides a cooling effect, which is particularly important for materials with low thermal stability, such as PE, HMPE, and PP.

At the same time, water can have detrimental effects. In materials such as polyamide, aramids, and PBO, moisture acts as a plasticizer* and may promote hydrolysis**, weakening molecular bonds, reducing abrasion resistance, and impairing other mechanical properties. Water can also carry abrasive particles into the rope, further accelerating wear.

*Plasticizer — a substance that increases the plasticity and elasticity of a polymer.


**Hydrolysis — a chemical reaction between a substance and water that leads to molecular bond degradation and the formation of new compounds.

Comparative testing of yarn-on-yarn abrasion resistance of Vectran, Aramid, PBO, and HMPE.
Comparison of fatigue life of different materials under dry and wet conditions during CI-1503 yarn-on-yarn abrasion testing.
Source: kuraray.com

To keep this article broadly applicable, we deliberately focused on polymer properties and the textile characteristics of materials rather than the detailed design of finished ropes. For this reason, rope construction itself is not listed among the primary abrasion-related factors.


That said, readers specifically interested in ropes should also consider numerous construction-related parameters when evaluating abrasion resistance and other performance characteristics. These include rope type (twisted or braided), strand twist count and tension, braiding pattern and angle, core-to-sheath ratio and interaction, as well as many other design features.

Next, we turn to the coefficient of friction — another key parameter that influences not only abrasion resistance but also a wide range of other rope performance characteristics.

Coefficient of Friction

The coefficient of friction (CoF) is a dimensionless parameter describing the resistance to sliding motion between two contacting bodies. It is defined as the ratio of the frictional force between two surfaces to the normal force pressing them together.

The coefficient of friction depends on:
  • the properties of the interacting materials, including their shape and tendency to deform (flatten), surface texture, and the presence of contaminants or special coatings (treatments);
  • contact pressure and sliding speed;
  • environmental conditions, particularly temperature and humidity.
Factors affecting rope CoF
Factors affecting the coefficient of friction of ropes.
Source: samsonrope.com
Coefficient-of-friction values can range from near zero to greater than one. A low CoF indicates that a material — such as HMPE — slides easily over a surface with minimal resistance and, all else being equal, is less prone to wear. Conversely, materials with a high coefficient of friction, such as aramids and PBO, provide excellent grip but generate more frictional heat and typically wear faster.

When referring to the coefficient of friction of a material, one usually implies typical or averaged values measured against commonly encountered surfaces. For instance, HMPE friction data are most often reported relative to steel, while rubber friction is commonly evaluated against asphalt. In technical and scientific literature, however, the coefficient of friction is always specified for a defined material pair (e.g., “nylon against steel”).
Coefficient-of-friction values for selected materials.
Indicative coefficient-of-friction values for selected materials, provided for baseline comparison.
Source: awrf.org
Two main types of coefficient of friction are commonly distinguished: static and dynamic.

  • Static CoF

The static coefficient of friction describes resistance to the initiation of sliding. It is measured just before motion begins, when the applied force is insufficient to cause movement. In most cases, the static CoF is higher than the dynamic one, since initiating motion requires overcoming surface adhesion.

For ropes, the static coefficient of friction has direct practical relevance. It governs grip on surfaces and hardware, determines the load at which slippage begins, and is critical for assessing holding reliability in anchors, belay and rappel devices, and knots.
Static coefficient of friction between the rope and the drum of a marine capstan winch.
On a marine capstan winch, the static coefficient of friction between the rope and the drum determines how much load can be held before slipping begins. A higher static CoF of provides secure grip with fewer wraps, while a lower CoF requires additional turns to achieve the same holding force.
Source: «Handbook of Fibre Rope Technology», 2004

  • Dynamic CoF

The dynamic (kinetic) coefficient of friction describes the resistance between two surfaces once relative motion has already begun. It is typically lower than the static coefficient, since sliding reduces surface interlocking and adhesive interactions.

Since sliding friction leads to abrasion and generates heat — both of which accelerate material degradation — the dynamic coefficient of friction is a key factor in rope wear and service life. It also affects the smoothness and controllability of rope movement through devices and over surfaces. Low internal friction between fibers and strands not only improves resistance to internal abrasion but also promotes more uniform load distribution, which typically enhances overall rope strength.
Comparison of the dynamic coefficient of friction of selected fibers against metal
Comparison of the dynamic coefficient of friction of selected fibers against metal under dry and wet conditions, measured at a relative load of 22.2 mN/tex and a sliding speed of 100 m/min, in accordance with ASTM D3108 / D3108M standard.
Source: hwstock.org

Cut Resistance

Cut resistance refers to the ability of a material or product to withstand damage caused by contact with sharp objects.

Unlike abrasion resistance, which describes progressive wear under repeated interaction with rough or abrasive surfaces, cut resistance addresses short-duration, highly localized mechanical loading.

In this context, sharp objects are defined by their ability to concentrate force over a very small contact area. Typical examples include cutting tools such as knives and blades, thin metal edges found in structural elements, as well as natural hazards like sharp rock fragments and ice shards.
Cutting over a sharp edge is one of the most critical hazards for climbing ropes.
Source: edelrid.com, youtube.com/@HardIsEasy
Although the cut resistance of a given material depends on multiple contributing factors (discussed below), a general pattern can nonetheless be identified:
Cut resistance of materials used in ropes

Mechanisms of Cutting

For a cut to form in a material under the combined action of a normal force* and the sliding motion of a sharp object, the cutting edge must overcome several resistance mechanisms:

  • Molecular Cohesion — the internal bonding forces between molecules within a homogeneous material, which determine its intrinsic strength and resistance to external mechanical loading.

  • Molecular Adhesion between the material being cut and the blade’s side surfaces. Adhesion (from the Latin adhaesio, meaning “sticking”) refers to the bonding between dissimilar surfaces in contact, arising from intermolecular or chemical interactions.

  • Hysteresis Friction — a form of friction associated with internal energy dissipation in a deformable material during contact with another surface. It originates from the material’s viscoelastic behavior** and the repeated compression–relaxation cycles occurring in the blade–material contact zone. These cyclic deformations dissipate part of the applied mechanical energy as heat, thereby increasing resistance to cutting.

*Normal force is the force acting perpendicular to the contact surface between two bodies and represents the reaction of the surface to an applied load.


**Viscoelasticity describes the ability of a material to exhibit both elastic deformation and viscous flow, depending on the duration and nature of the applied load.

Standards for Evaluating Cut Resistance of Textile Materials

ISO 13997 "Protective clothing – Mechanical properties – Determination of resistance to cutting by sharp objects".

EN 388 "Standard for Protective Gloves Against Mechanical Risks".

• ASTM F1790 "Standard Test Method for Measuring Cut Resistance of Materials Used in Protective Clothing with CPP Test Equipment".

ANSI/ISEA 105 "American National Standard For Hand Protection Classification".
TDM-100 test apparatus used to evaluate the cut resistance of textile materials
TDM-100 test apparatus used to evaluate the cut resistance of textile materials in accordance with ISO 13997, ASTM F1790, and ANSI/ISEA 105. These standards employ a common principle: the distance traveled by a horizontally sliding blade is measured until the material is fully severed under a prescribed normal force.
Source: youtube.com/@PipusaInc
Cut resistance of selected materials, measured according to ASTM F1790-97 standard.
Cut resistance of selected materials, measured according to ASTM F1790-97 standard.
The vertical axis indicates applied load (grams-force, gf), while the horizontal axis shows fabric areal density (ounces per square yard, oz/yd²).
The material labeled “CRF PET” is a modified (reinforced) variant and may be excluded from comparison.
Source: «Cut resistant fiber and textiles for enhanced safety and performance in industrial and commercial applications», 1999

At present, there is no universally recognized standard for measuring the cut resistance of ropes, cords, or slings.

Although various dynamic and static test methods have been proposed by organizations such as the UIAA, as well as by individual researchers and manufacturers, none have achieved widespread adoption, largely because of inconsistent results and the complexity of the tests.

Nevertheless, a recent method developed by the German company Edelrid deserves special attention.

Factors Affecting Cut Resistance of Ropes

The cut resistance of synthetic ropes in particular — and textile materials (fibers, threads, and strands) in general — is influenced by several factors:
1) Structural Properties of the Rope Material
Including,

  • Strength: The higher the material’s ultimate tensile strength, the greater the stress required to compromise its integrity.
  • Elasticity. Materials with higher Young’s modulus are more prone to microcrack formation and propagation under blade pressure. Lower-modulus materials tend to resist cutting better, all else being equal.

  • Toughness determines the material’s ability to absorb energy and, like Young’s modulus, affects resistance to microcrack development under cutting.

  • Hardness. Hard materials are more resistant to blade penetration and cause more blade wear, potentially dulling the edge. Excessive hardness, however, can make a material brittle*.

  • Thermal Stability. Friction-induced heat can weaken thermally sensitive fibers, reducing their mechanical properties and cut resistance.

*Brittleness is the tendency of a material to fracture without significant plastic deformation. Opposite of plasticity.


**Brittle fracture is a type of failure in which the material exhibits little or no plastic or elastic deformation. Because the material cannot redistribute stress, even a small crack in a loaded area can propagate rapidly, potentially leading to catastrophic failure.

2) Rope Construction & Textile Characteristics
  • Construction. Braided, twisted, woven, or spun structures differ in density, flexibility, and load distribution, all affecting cut resistance. Kernmantle ropes, for instance, use a high-strength twisted core and a protective braided sheath for improved cut resistance.

  • Fineness. Thin fibers may fail more easily due to stress concentration, but they also bend and redistribute energy, potentially enhancing cut resistance. Properly dense thin-fiber ropes can match or surpass thicker-fiber ropes of equivalent size and mass.

It is important to note that a product’s size or diameter (e.g., a rope) does not directly determine its cut resistance. These dimensions only indirectly indicate the energy and work needed for cutting, as the blade must traverse a distance proportional to the material’s thickness. In other words, a thicker material does not inherently resist cutting better, but it extends the blade’s path, increasing the energy and time required for severing.

Relationship between cutting energy and rope diameter.
Relationship between cutting energy and rope diameter.
Tests were performed on nylon dynamic climbing ropes manufactured by Mammut under a tensile load of 10 kN.
The deviation observed for the 9.7 mm rope (highlighted in red) is attributed to differences in impregnation relative to the other samples. Notably, despite only modest differences in diameter between the thinnest (8.7 mm) and thickest (10.2 mm) ropes, the energy required for complete cutting varies by nearly a factor of three.
Source: «On the analysis of cut resistance in polymer-based climbing ropes», 2017
  • Density. In general, materials with more fibers, yarns, or strands per unit area are harder to cut. This effect arises from two main factors:

a) Load distribution: A denser fiber network distributes the blade’s force across more fibers, reducing local stress and slowing penetration.

b) Increased friction: Greater contact between the blade and the fibers increases friction, which also impedes cutting.

However, excessively high density can restrict fiber mobility, preventing them from deflecting away from the blade. In this case, the blade meets less resistance, travels a shorter distance, and requires less energy to cut through the material. As a result, cut resistance reaches its maximum at an optimal fiber density.
Left: Teufelberger ropes with 16-, 32-, and 48-strand sheath constructions.
Right: Tendon sheath braiding patterns, where “Tandem” denotes paired braiding and “SBS” (Simple Braiding System) denotes a simple braid.
Despite having finer individual strands, the denser 48-strand SBS construction exhibits the highest cut and abrasion resistance among the configurations shown.
Source: teufelberger.com, mytendon.com
3) Rope Coefficient of Friction
Friction influences cut resistance in different ways. High friction at the cutting edge facilitates cutting, while high friction along the blade’s sides dissipates energy and slows the process. Conversely, low material friction can prevent the blade from penetrating, causing it to slide over the surface without engaging the fibers. As a result, materials with smooth, “slippery” surfaces (e.g., HMPE), or those treated with anti-friction coatings, can reduce the likelihood of cutting or diminish its effectiveness.
4) Rope Coating
Depending on composition, coatings may either reduce or increase cut resistance by:

  • Raising friction at the material–blade interface.
  • Enhancing adhesion between the material and the cutting edge.
  • Filling microvoids and reinforcing the polymer matrix, thereby forming a denser, mechanically resistant layer that impedes blade penetration.
  • Restricting fiber mobility and redistributing load, which limits fiber separation and reduces stress concentration.
  • Enhancing heat dissipation.
Protective gloves cut resistance
Protective gloves achieve cut resistance using high-strength materials (e.g., aramid, HMPE), dense multilayer weaves, and protective coatings, which increase friction, distribute load, and prevent blade penetration.
5) External Factors
  • Properties of the Cutting Object, including:

Sharpness. A sharper, thinner blade requires less energy to initiate fiber failure. By concentrating force over a smaller contact area, it generates higher local pressure and penetrates the textile structure more easily.

Hardness. A harder cutting object maintains its sharpness and cutting efficiency for a longer time, reducing edge degradation during interaction with the material.

Edge geometry. A small sharpening angle increases blade sharpness and lowers the force needed to cut the material, while serrated or wavy edges damage the textile structure by gripping the surface and tearing fibers apart.
Dynamic rope cut when forced over a sharp edge under the load of a falling climber.
A 10-mm dynamic nylon rope fails under the load of a falling climber when forced over a sharp edge.
Source: youtube.com/@teamBMCTV
  • Applied Load (i.e., tension) significantly reduces the energy required to cut textile materials, for several interrelated reasons:

Reduced Linear Density. Stretching decreases the diameter and cross-sectional area of fibers, yarns, and strands. This reduces the blade–material contact area, concentrates the cutting force over a smaller surface, and thereby lowers the material’s overall resistance to cutting.

Fiber Alignment. Under tension, fibers lose the ability to bend and shift relative to one another. Their capacity to dissipate energy is therefore reduced, making them more susceptible to cutting.

Moreover, when a sharp object severs part of a loaded structure — such as a rope — the applied load is redistributed to the remaining intact strands and fibers. This redistribution can lead either to immediate failure or, if the residual strength is sufficient, to additional elongation accompanied by further diameter reduction and heat generation. Taken together, these effects increase the likelihood of progressive cutting and subsequent failure.
  • Cutting speed (cutting velocity). Increasing the cutting speed reduces the force required to sever textile materials. This results from the shortened interaction time between the blade and the material, which limits the ability of the constituent fibers to deform, absorb energy, and redistribute stresses. Consequently, the failure mechanism becomes more brittle (i.e., less ductile), reducing the material’s resistance to cutting.
Relationship between cutting speed and the peak force required to sever Kevlar and carbon fibers
Relationship between cutting speed and the peak force required to sever Kevlar and carbon fibers.
Source: «Evaluation of cutting force of high-performance fibers’ dynamic cutting behaviour», 2021
  • Environmental Conditions, including:

Temperature. Elevated temperatures may soften and degrade materials with limited thermal stability (e.g., PE, HMPE, PP, PA), reducing fiber strength, elasticity, and cut resistance. Low temperatures, on the other hand, make materials more brittle, particularly in the presence of moisture: when water freezes, it limits the fibers’ ability to undergo plastic deformation and, as a result, further reduces their resistance to cutting.

Humidity. As discussed in the section on abrasion resistance, high humidity can substantially weaken moisture-sensitive fibers such as polyamide, aramid, and polybenzoxazole, leading to a pronounced drop in cut resistance. At the same time, water may reduce friction between the blade and the material, decreasing the likelihood of blade engagement and deep penetration.

◦ etc.

  • Cutting Angle — the orientation of the blade relative to the material — plays a critical role in determining the energy required for cutting. Three primary orientations are typically distinguished: normal, longitudinal, and transverse. Let's look at each of them in more detail.
Испытательный аппарат для определения стойкости текстильных волокон к разрезанию
(a) Fiber cut resistance test apparatus.
(b) Schematic representation of blade–fiber orientations used in the tests:
Normal Incidence – fiber horizontal, blade perpendicular.
Longitudinal Incidence – fiber at 45°, blade perpendicular.
Transverse Incidence – fiber horizontal, blade at 45°.
Source: «Statistical cut response of high-performance single fibers», 2018

Normal incidence — the blade moves vertically downward across the material. In this configuration, the materials under consideration exhibit significantly higher resistance to cutting than under longitudinal or transverse incidence.
Longitudinal Incidence — the blade moves vertically downward while the material is positioned at an angle.

During longitudinal cutting, a portion of the applied force is resolved along the fiber axis. The combined action of cutting, shear, and compressive stresses promotes the splitting of fibrils from the parent fiber. This mechanism is governed by weak interfibrillar adhesion and the anisotropic* nature of fibrous materials, in which resistance to failure is highest along one direction and markedly lower in others.

*Anisotropy (from Ancient Greek ἄνισος — unequal, and τρόπος — direction) describes the dependence of material properties on direction; its opposite is isotropy.

Transverse Incidence — the blade is inclined and moves vertically across the material.

During transverse cutting, blade stress decreases as the cutting angle increases. This occurs because new sections of the cutting edge continuously engage the fiber as the blade slides, reducing the effect of edge dulling. In addition, shear stresses can trigger interfibrillar failure mechanisms that are not active during straight (normal incidence) cuts.
Summary of blade stress for fibers of different materials by orientation.
Summary of blade stress for fibers of different materials by orientation.
Blade stress represents the stress in the contact zone between the blade edge and the fiber, allowing objective comparison of cut resistance independent of fiber diameter.
A total of 180 tests were performed per material (60 per orientation).
Source: «Statistical cut response of high-performance single fibers», 2018

*Standard deviation is the most common measure of dispersion relative to the mean.


**Coefficient of variation, or relative standard deviation, is a normalized measure of data dispersion expressed as a percentage and calculated as the ratio of standard deviation to the mean.

Comparison of mean blade stresses and standard deviations for different materials by fiber and blade orientation.
Comparison of mean blade stresses and standard deviations for different materials by fiber and blade orientation.
Source: «Statistical cut response of high-performance single fibers», 2018
In summary, textile fibers exhibit the greatest resistance to straight cuts, moderate resistance to longitudinal cuts, and the lowest resistance to transverse cuts.
Here we take a short break — only to return in Part III, ready to delve further into the fascinating world of textile materials and modern synthetic fiber ropes. Up next: thermal stability, moisture and UV resistance, chemical durability, and several other important and intriguing characteristics.

Did you find an inaccuracy?

Would like to commend, criticize or hire?

Contact me on bikulov.r.a@gmail.com or telegram

For more articles please visit the knowledge section

You can also financially support the author's work here


Renat Bikulov

Author

Did you find an inaccuracy?
Would like to commend, criticize or hire?
Contact me on bikulov.r.a@gmail.com or telegram
For more articles please visit the knowledge section
You can also financially support the author's work here
Renat Bikulov
Author
Share:
Subscribe:
Made on
Tilda